Chatting w/AI philosopher Cristina DiGiacomo + "One of the Best Things I've Ever Read"
Yes, I recognize that shift you describe.
From asking what AI does, to asking what we choose to build through it.
In my own work, I keep coming back to the same unease.
We are scaling decisions faster than we are scaling responsibility.
I grew up in Sweden, close to the nuclear debate.
What struck me, even then, was how responsibility was built into the system.
The waste didn’t disappear. It stayed with you.
When I look at AI today, I feel that contrast.
The impact scales. But responsibility becomes harder to locate.
For me, that’s where the real question sits.
If humans are the engine behind AI, why aren’t human consequences part of the system itself?
I’ve been trying to think this through from an infrastructure lens, not just tools:
https://saraeson.substack.com/p/what-falldin-knew
Not whether AI is aligned.
But aligned to what, and accountable to whom.
Thank you Sree for this honorable summary of our incredible conversation. Grateful that you are sharing my work.
Yes, I recognize that shift you describe.
From asking what AI does, to asking what we choose to build through it.
In my own work, I keep coming back to the same unease.
We are scaling decisions faster than we are scaling responsibility.
I grew up in Sweden, close to the nuclear debate.
What struck me, even then, was how responsibility was built into the system.
The waste didn’t disappear. It stayed with you.
When I look at AI today, I feel that contrast.
The impact scales. But responsibility becomes harder to locate.
For me, that’s where the real question sits.
If humans are the engine behind AI, why aren’t human consequences part of the system itself?
I’ve been trying to think this through from an infrastructure lens, not just tools:
https://saraeson.substack.com/p/what-falldin-knew
Not whether AI is aligned.
But aligned to what, and accountable to whom.
Thank you Sree for this honorable summary of our incredible conversation. Grateful that you are sharing my work.